Conservative leadership candidate Kemi Badenoch is under fire for supporting a pamphlet that suggests people with autism receive preferential treatment. The pamphlet, unveiled at a campaign event, discusses ways for the Conservative Party to regain momentum and includes contributions from 24 of Badenoch’s supporters. It argues that current approaches to mental health, especially in relation to autism and anxiety, have not been effective in improving outcomes. The section specifically mentions that individuals diagnosed with neurodiversity conditions like anxiety and autism receive economic advantages and protections similar to those based on race or sex discrimination laws.
A spokesperson for Badenoch defended the report, emphasizing the importance of discussing mental health issues openly without being misinterpreted by the media. Badenoch’s involvement in the report was highlighted, but critics, including former Conservative justice secretary Robert Buckland, found the assessment of provisions for autistic individuals to be flawed. Buckland, who conducted a review on employment rates among autistic individuals, disagreed with the report’s characterization of anxiety and autism, stating that they should not be conflated.
The report also claims that children with autism receive better treatment and equipment in schools, while adults with the condition have easier access to claiming unfair dismissal. It suggests a shift in societal perception towards mental health, from individual responsibility to collective adaptation by schools and employers. However, concerns have been raised about the lack of adequate support for special needs in schools, as highlighted by former education secretary Gillian Keegan.
Criticism of Badenoch’s remarks and actions during her campaign, such as her comments on maternity pay and civil servants leaking information, have led to questions about her understanding and compassion for the British people. Her statements at the Conservative Party conference were met with backlash, including her initial remarks on maternity pay, which she later clarified. Despite reaching the final two in the Conservative leadership race, Badenoch’s controversial statements continue to draw scrutiny and raise concerns about her suitability for leadership.
Overall, the controversy surrounding Badenoch’s endorsement of the pamphlet and her campaign rhetoric underscores the importance of sensitivity and accuracy when addressing issues related to mental health, autism, and other neurodiversity conditions. It also highlights the need for politicians to engage thoughtfully and empathetically with diverse communities to ensure inclusivity and understanding in policymaking and public discourse.