The Government will have recourse before the TC reprobation of the King by the Parliament without the backing of the State Council

The Government presented an appeal of unconstitutionality against the resolution of the Parliament rejects the King

, The Government decrees the reprobation of Felipe VI: “The Parliament expresses the will of the people, the King”

The Council of Ministers has given the green light on Friday to filing a notice of appeal to the Constitutional Court against the resolution of the 11th of October, of the plenary of the Catalan Parliament for the reprobaba to the King for the role it is playing in relation to the procés and, in particular, for his intervention following the events of a year ago with the declaration of independence.

What has been announced in Seville, the minister’s spokesman, Isabel Celaá, after the first meeting of the Council of Ministers that occurs outside of The Moncloa, after which explained that imminent, it will go to the Constitutional resolution of the camera autonomic. A resource that will stand despite a ruling against the Council of State, which has been ruled against in the report is prescriptive, but not binding, that the Executive asked last week and which has now received.

The Government believes that the judgment and attacks on Philip VI by the Parliament are not admissible and constitute a “new attempt to start a one-sided process” that leads to the proclamation of the Catalan republic. It is, in addition, has said Celaá, an “overreach” and an “attack ” unreasonably” to the King that the Government is not going to consent.

The minister’s spokeswoman has given some clues as to the report of the Council of State and has detailed that the peak consultative body, even though you do not see fundamentals for a resource to the TC, see the resolutions of the Parliament as an “attack on the principle of institutional loyalty”.

“Total lack of respect” to the King

Understand the Council of State that the action of the plenary of the Parliament is a “total lack of respect to the highest magistracy of the State”, but that, nevertheless, the motions approved by the majority of its members have a political rather than legal and, therefore, have no practical effects. “But the Government understands that the resolution is unconstitutional”, has insisted the minister.

“The Government’s sense of State is going to appeal to the Constitutional,” he added, at the same time has shown the “institutional respect” of the Executive the opinion of the Council of State, “do not share”.

On the same line, has emphasized that “it is not the subject of discussion,” everything that refers to the crown and to the modification of the form of the State. “The figure of the head of State is inviolable and should not be the subject of dispute in favour”, has apostille.

According to the criteria of

Learn more

Exit mobile version