The public Prosecutor Superior of Catalonia has completed its investigation of the Mossos d’esquadra that identified several activists who were stripped of symbols and material independence, as ties yellow, on the night of 17 August 2018, in the towns of Mora la Nova, Tivissa and Vandellos. Despite filing the majority of the actions reported by Boost Citizen and some citizens, the Public Ministry has forwarded the proceedings to the Prosecutor’s office Provincial of Tarragona to initiate an investigation of the filtration of data in social networks on planes commandeered to the ‘quitalazos’ identified.
In this regard, the deputy prosecutor of Catalonia, Pedro Ariche, believes that he could commit a crime of revelation of secrets committed by a public official, in particular by someone in the police station of Mora d’ebre of the Mossos, although without specifying the person who could perpetrate. That’s why requests to the office of the Prosecutor of Tarragona, the completion of the research, since that has conferred those powers.
In his decree, the prosecutor believes that it is “an objectively serious, and that transcends the limits of the merely disciplinary” that is filtered this documentation that carried the ‘quitalazos’. He felt, however, that you can not prove that the personal data of the activists identified as well as that one of them was a member of the Civil Guard were filtered by public officials.
from the reports of the Mossos, the prosecutor concludes that the condition of agent of the Guardia was known by several people “from the first moment the facts by a multitude of people, even some from outside the Body of the Mossos d Esqueadra”. The same thing happens with the personal data of other activists who denounced hostigamento or threats by the networks when they spread their names. The prosecutor notes that the Autonomous inquired this possible filtration by analyzing the network without results by indicating that “his patent lack of collaboration has just frustando the good end of the investigation.”
with Respect to the plans, with indications on various populations that carried the activists, which is included in the packed court, the prosecutor concludes that the filtering on social networks, “was carried out or facilitated by officers of the Cos de Mossos d’esquadra, attached to the police Station of Mora d’ebre. A out he said that with the mobile phone that is rotated among the shifts made pictures of the flat, but denied its dissemination.
On the police report and del17 of August after the intervention in Mora La Nova and the identification of suspects, the prosecutor believes that “police management of the incident is at least unfortunate, not to say that cosntituye an authentic nonsense” because the police officers were assured that the withdrawal of symbology-partisan, as independence is “illegal action”. A court of Falset already closed the case opened against the ‘quitalazos’ from the report of the Mossos.
Finally, the Prosecutor’s office an eyesore to the Department of Interior that difundiese by the social networks that the 14 identified could be sanctioned with the application of “serious” citizen security law, and that not desmintiese “the false perception that certain paramilitary groups ideology campaban” for the county to say nothing of the alarm you created. In this sense, the Public Ministry, notes that when it issued the message, the police report was not finished and that the infringement could be “mild” and not “serious”.
For the fiscal “the Department of the Interior are allowed, with the occasion of a trivial incident of identification of a people that ‘made noise’, withdrew the determined symbology of the public highway, carrying, in the end, the same tools or tooling used by those who have previously located, and, in your case, ‘striped’ metal sign of a private nature and installed in public place”, in reference to the “Municipi Adherit to the Associació de Municipis per la Independència, to “send a message conminatorio for the citizens, especially those committed dates.” In concrete details that the Government had a “lack of objectivity” because it suggested to him that the people involved in remove symbology party would be “severely punished”. However, the Prosecution believes that this attitude is not a criminal offence but of a “reproach to the plane of the action partisan politics”.
According to the criteria of
Learn more