The SPD wants to provide additional relief to millions of people in view of the high inflation rates. The money should come from the CO2 tax. Finance Minister Lindner reacts reservedly. His party reminds that the agreed plan with the climate money was actually different.
With the annual payment of “social climate money”, Federal Minister of Social Affairs Hubertus Heil wants to relieve low and medium incomes from next year. He is also planning to increase the standard rates for basic security by up to 50 euros as part of the citizen income. This should be achieved by changing the calculation, as the SPD politician told the Funke media group. FDP leader Christian Lindner reacted cautiously to the advances. The Greens welcomed the announcement in principle. Heil estimated the cost of both proposals to be in the tens of billions. “We are still in model calculations.”
Heil said rising energy and food prices are hitting low-income people particularly hard. Temporary relief is no longer enough. Heil referred to the goal of climate neutrality, regardless of the war in Ukraine. So energy is getting more expensive. “We have to give an answer that goes beyond the current relief package.” He proposes social climate money that should be given to single earners with a monthly gross wage of less than 4,000 euros and married couples with less than 8,000 euros. The exact staggering is still to be discussed in the coalition. “I want to bring this into the coalition because as Minister for Social Affairs I have a responsibility – even if the lead lies more with the Finance Minister and the Climate Minister.”
Furthermore, according to Heil, higher standard rates should apply as part of the new citizens’ allowance, which is to replace the current Hartz IV system from 2023. “My suggestion is that in family households, for example, we take the bottom 30 instead of the bottom 20 percent of income as the basis.” This means that more needs would be assumed when calculating the rates. “In this way we can achieve that the standard rates of citizen income per person and month will be around 40 to 50 euros higher than in the basic security.”
FDP leader Christian Lindner said Heil’s initiative shows that the SPD has not forgotten the redistribution policy. “Since debt and tax increases are ruled out, I’m curious about the financing ideas.” A reform of the wage and income tax is much closer than new pots. “If salaries rise, the state must not earn disproportionately.”
FDP climate expert Olaf in der Beek said: “The climate money agreed in the coalition agreement should not be a new socio-political instrument, as Minister Heil is currently proposing.” Rather, it should support the ability to finance climate protection measures for people and create more acceptance for cost-intensive climate protection measures. Audretsch called the climate money “a key instrument for making climate protection social by paying the income from the CO2 price directly back to the people”. The SPD, Greens and FDP had already announced climate money as a “social compensation mechanism” in the coalition agreement “in view of higher CO2 price components”.
The Verdi services union welcomed Heil’s proposal as a step in the right direction. “The climate money can finally provide relief that the previous packages cannot do,” said Verdi chairman Frank Werneke. However, it shouldn’t stop there. Rather, “all income from CO2 pricing would have to be returned in full to the citizens in order to create effective relief”.
The President of the Federal Association of Wholesale, Foreign Trade and Services (BGA), Dirk Jandura, called Heil’s solution wrong. One of the main causes of high energy prices is the state. “In Germany, energy is taxed above average compared to other European countries,” explained Jandura. “The state takes money to then redistribute it as climate money.”
The head of the German Institute for Economic Research, Marcel Fratzscher, criticizes the climate money as insufficient. Although it is “good and right,” he said ntv. “It is also clear that such climate money is rather too small to compensate for the high inflation, especially for people with low incomes.” In addition, the climate money was not created as a reaction to the effects of the war in Ukraine, but “would have come one way or the other, because that was an agreement in the coalition agreement”. That’s why it should “not be sold as a reaction to high inflation”.
Instead, Fratzscher called for “specific relief for people with low incomes, especially with food, so that they can cushion the shock of high inflation”. Experts assume that the climate money could average up to 200 euros per capita and year. “Family with low income would actually need 100 to 150 euros a month,” said the economist.
