Yesterday he played to deny everything. Two days after that the president of the Government in the Congress appeal to a proposal of Federico Trillo to restrict the qualification of the crime of rebellion, to the military coups themselves of the past, the spokesman Celaá adopted the pose institutional other Friday you lack to incur a gross lie: “The Government does not speak of the Judiciary, nor is it intended to guide you”. And dismissed as mere freedom opinativa the obvious exercise of pressure of Pedro Sanchez from the podium, a gesture with which hopes to consolidate the alliance with the separatists of which depend on not only their Budgets but the duration of this legislature and the possibility of revalidating the position in the following.
it Is between shameful and outrageous cynicism with which the Government denies pressure on the Supreme Court that all the world has seen. In the weeks since, and in line with the demands of Joan Tardà or Pablo Iglesias, almost not a day passes without a charge, a socialist, a minister, and especially the vice-president Calvo insist on not seeing rebellion at the blow to the Constitution a year ago. Only when the trickle of opinions that are perfectly aligned has been upset with the Supreme, leaves Celaá and exhibits a little bit of respect to Montesquieu.
we have Already said here that the political discourse is not innocent, nor can it be elastic. The scruples in the observance of the separation of powers may not rely on the covenants that Sanchez has apalabrados with its partners in censorship. It would appear that the Government tightens the judges when their allies asked, and when the judges protest, and the public is adversely affected, then announces a resource to defend the King and brand profile constitutionalist in his statements. Although under the rope keep pressing the State attorney to reduce the legal qualification to sedition and content as well to the independence. This game of calculated intermittency by pure interest of power constitutes a political embarrassment and irresponsible institutional. Because it is not only destroys the credibility of Sanchez against the Spanish, but also damages the image of our democracy to the often confused international opinion.
According to the criteria of
Learn more