London’s Serpentine Pavilion has been a staple of experimental architecture for over two decades. However, according to Phineas Harper, the commitment to giving overseas architects their first English commission may be hindering the potential for innovative and purposeful designs. The latest pavilion, designed by South Korean practice Mass Studies, features five black-stained timber portals surrounding a circular void with cement paving. Each portal serves a different function, but some elements, such as a “library of unread books,” have left visitors puzzled.
Critics argue that the Serpentine Pavilion series has lost its edge in recent years, with few standout designs since the 2014 glowing egg by Smiljan Radi?. The strict brief, which requires the involvement of an “internationally known architect” creating their first structure in England, may limit the potential for groundbreaking designs. The construction process has also been criticized for lacking transparency and collaboration with the winning architects.
Despite these challenges, there is hope for revitalizing the Serpentine Pavilion programme. Harper suggests exploring local materials, taking the pavilions on the road to different towns each year, or dedicating structures to specific themes like children’s spaces. By embracing more innovative and timely briefs, the pavilions could once again capture the imagination of audiences and contribute meaningfully to architecture, the country, and the climate.
While the Serpentine Pavilion may be facing competition from smaller, more community-focused structures, there is still potential for the programme to evolve and adapt. By encouraging collaboration with local organizations and exploring new materials and design concepts, the pavilions could regain their relevance and continue to inspire architects and visitors alike. Harper’s insight into the challenges and opportunities facing the Serpentine Pavilion programme offers a fresh perspective on the future of this iconic London landmark.
