news-24092024-164439

Debates Heating Up: Two Big Fights Set for Labour Conference Floor

The upcoming Labour conference in 2024 has seen many important issues being pushed aside through the use of “priorities ballots” and bureaucratic maneuvers. However, it appears that two major political battles are set to take center stage.

One of these fights revolves around Winter Fuel Payments and taxing wealth, with a composite motion from the Unite and CWU unions at the forefront. Conference organizers seem keen on downplaying this debate by scheduling it for the final session on Wednesday morning, and may employ other tactics to diminish its impact.

The other significant debate is focused on migration and asylum, labeled as “Border Security Command” on the agenda. A right-wing composite motion endorsing Labour government policy on asylum and migration, emphasizing punitive measures, is expected to be discussed on Tuesday, September 24. Despite an alternative motion from Rushcliffe CLP being ruled out, reports suggest that the Fire Brigades Union, Unison, and Unite are prepared to vote against the proposed motion. Strong speeches from these unions could rally delegates from various CLPs and unions, potentially leading to a significant opposition vote.

In previous years, the right-wing faction won the CLPs’ Priorities Ballot by promoting uncontentious topics to maintain unity and avoid negative media attention. However, this year, a bold move by a section of the right-wing has seen a push for clear-cut motions to be debated. While traditionally focused on influencing leadership rather than conference decisions, the right-wing is now seeking to champion their policies openly. It remains to be seen whether these motions will be defeated or face a significant protest vote.

Additionally, motions under the “Growth Mission” topics have also displayed a right-wing leaning, albeit in a more subdued manner compared to the contentious “Borders” motions. As the Labour conference approaches, the stage is set for intense debates and potential clashes of ideologies within the party.