PP and citizens refused to be part of the “demagogy of populism” the United States proposal we can limit the price of nuclear energy and hydroelectric through a Royal Decree Law.
It is the last occurrence of the purple party to shake the criticism that is receiving by the prices of record in the bill of light – to promises to their voters of a drop when they govern – and to redirect all that wear and social pressure towards
The PSOE.
The opposition expressed on Monday a non-resounding to that proposal and put the focus on which to reduce the bill of light, the Government has to face, mainly, a “taxation of taxation”, to drastically lower taxes that end up inflating the
Invoice of light and afreversing in all Spaniards.
The leader of the PP, Pablo Married, put several of those taxes on the firder, advocating for acting “removing the non-energy costs of the invoice.”
In the opinion of him, the “fiscal drop” has to be done in the electricity generation tax and also in VAT.
Respect for the latter, facing a “more elongated” reduction over time that the temporary patch approved last July by the government to reduce the 4% to 10% assessment until the end of the year.
Thereafter, it would be resulted in 21%, precisely when the demand for energy because of the cold is also very high.
That is why the PP insists on lowering the VAT.
For married, one of the great problems of receipt of light is in “non-energy costs” that “have been added by bad energy policies” from socialist governments and shoot the final price that end up paying Spaniard consumers.
“They have to leave the invoice,” he summed up sharply into a statements in Jumilla (Murcia) after visiting a cellar.
Regarding the proposal prepared by the Ministry of Social Rights that directs Ione Belarra and the consumption, which leads Alberto Garzón, the PP president Ironized with the “curious” that it turns out to see that we can “now defend nuclear energy” and concluded
That “the demagogy of the left at the end is found with the price and reality.”
Well, the nuclear, in the opinion of it, is essential in combination with renewable energies.
The United States proposal can found hard words in citizens.
His spokesman, Edmundo Bal, cried out of “populism” that the dwellings present the initiative as a “magic solution” to lower the light, when it comes to a much more complex problem that requires more depth.
“It’s taking ourselves by fools,” he said, “is the demagogue of populism.”
“Until two days ago they said that what was needed was a public energy company,” BAL has been incided by a press conference, “but since they have realized that they have put the leg, they are now looking for other types of solutions.”
CS put the focus on taxes, among others “many” actions that it considers urgent to placate the constant rise in light.
The Liberal spokeswoman affirmed that the VAT has to be lowered, stop calculating this tribute over others such as the generation of electricity, analyze the energy generation costs of each sources, review how prices are fixed in the system
Marginist and prevent certain practices that may involve a rise in the price of light artificially.
BAL also pointed out the possibility of reforming nuclear power plants and advocated “renegoticing the conditions” of concessions to generate hydroelectric energy as the concessions fulfill.
“Not to put them in a public company,” he stressed, but to reverse “a part of the benefit in citizenship.”
“There are many problems,” Bal alerted, “it is not resolved with a decree.”
