The growing defensive attitude towards China makes Americans and Indians the shoulder-to-shoulder exercise. Washington and New Delhi, respectively, under pressure by means of the Corona and the economic crisis, need to show successes. Both hope to approach an increasing number of orders for America’s arms industry and investments for India. The American foreign Ministers increased the pressure on China, even as he outlines India’s great opportunities:
Christoph Hein
Economics correspondent for South Asia/Pacific, based in Singapore.
F. A. Z.
It should entice the “value chain of China and its dependence on Chinese Goods in fields such as the telecommunication or the medical care decrease,” said Mike Pompeo via Video on a us-India economic summit. “India can do this, because it has gained the trust of many Nations around the world, including that of America.” India’s foreign Secretary Subrahmanyam Jaishankar said that America and India, “today, in cooperation with the opportunity to shape the world”.
Pompeo linked to economic and security interests
Prime Minister Narendra modi campaigned for investment in health, infrastructure, defense, energy, Agriculture and the insurance sector in India. Last year, managers had observed worldwide in the case of Vodafone, this was the high state demands from the Indian market. “India offers a perfect combination of openness and opportunity,” said modes, and campaigned with the rapidly growing digital market of almost 1.4 billion Indians.
Last week, had made modes, after years of delays, the European Union once more, hoping to finally be a free trade agreement. Unlike the Europeans Pompeo is forging an Anti-China Alliance: “Our infrastructure projects, our supply chains, our independence and the health and safety of our people are in danger if we make a mistake.” He linked economic and security interests of both countries: “The United States supports India’s security is never stronger than it is today. India, on the other hand, an important Partner and a key pillar in President Trumps foreign policy.“
