The attorney General sees currently no reason to assume the investigation because of the extreme right Drohschreiben that were sent in the name of “NSU 2.0”. So far there is no evidence for a competence of the Federal Prosecutor’s office, a spokesman said on Monday.
Marlene Grunert
editor in the policy.
F. A. Z.
The Prosecutor’s office in Frankfurt had already, on 10. July to the appropriate test requested, such as on Monday it became known. Here, the Frankfurt investigators were limited to the threats of the Left-politicians, Janine Wissler, Martina Renner, and Anne Helm. Wissler is Chairman, parliamentary group in the Hessian Parliament, Renner, Deputy of the Bundestag, helmet-Chairman, parliamentary group in the Berlin house of representatives.
The restriction to the three women is due to the fact that the law enforcement in principle, the country-level, the office of the attorney General, however, is only in legally regulated exceptional cases. The Karlsruhe investigators assume about when it comes to terrorism or treason. Among the offences for which the attorney General is also responsible, the organs, the anti-constitutional disparagement of constitutional. This Writing is based out of Frankfurt, as a spokesman for the office of the attorney General of the F. A. confirmed, for example.
“In continuous and close contact”
The denigration, is punished with imprisonment for a term of up to five years, must be done “in a the state’s Reputation-threatening way”; the offender must also “for efforts against the existence of the Federal Republic of Germany or against constitutional principles.”
These conditions it is not in the office of the attorney General for met, an official response to the Frankfurt public Prosecutor’s office is pending. The speaker in Karlsruhe, Germany, highlighted that due to the series of threatening e-mails about the sender “NSU 2.0”, “state string orchestra” as well as “national socialist offensive (NSO)”, in “continuous and close contact” with the investigating judicial authorities.
