Currently is placed in the didactic research and school practice, and value in inductive Learning. This means that each student learns at his own pace, according to its Motivation of the material itself chooses and his learning process to be as independent as possible organized. All of these are prerequisites for successful Learning in the modern learning research in the dozen occupied. Behind this educational premise, the obvious lesson is that each person is different and different interest were plugged in. In the school life of the leads, however, to what has frustrated the author in his internship at the most: After a profound and extensive education, he should take on the task of a task dispatcher, and as little as possible self-talk.
The classroom and the school are trying, in General, to be the paradigm of inductive learning. This school is an irresolvable contradiction: Inductive Learning, freedom and diversity, with the state demands at school and the associated power devices namely basically not connect. This contradiction has become in everyday life, in front of Corona in such a Routine that he noticed only the research – teachers and students to move into these contradictions quite sure-footed. Each student knows exactly when he has to obey. Each teacher is aware of clearly that the question “could someone get the window?!” formally, a command.
the Corona-crisis that it became necessary to distance teaching produces a Dilemma: on the one Hand calls for and promotes in the highest degree, the inductive Learning – children need to explain even more than usual items of it, on the other hand, the learning level of students in distance education are significantly worse to diagnose, they are finally deprived of most of the time the eye of the teacher. The diagnosis of the learning object and the learning group but is a prerequisite for a customized, individual needs.
blessed is The island of Happiness – the benefits of the pure tele-teaching
One thing about the forced auxiliary form of Online schooling, and perhaps their greatest achievement of all: you can be a curriculum that is based on voluntary participation. I was allowed to during the Corona-distance learning no attendance lists, and was grateful that this time-consuming Ritual of Power was lost. If a student during the video meeting, something Better had to do, I could not oblige him to participate. My role was limited to give any recommendations on this or that content deal, because the censor I was not allowed to the services provided.
The pure tele-education, I’m a true learning companion and not for breeding master – in my eyes, the crucial prerequisite for the learning motivation and the learning success of my students. Accordingly, I had no disciplinary problems as usual. Only those who are interested, participated in the Online Meeting, and the was a consistently high proportion of the entire class. With a certain amount of peer pressure not to appreciate probably is. Also interesting: My greatest disturbers were at once – probably due to the changed social role, and insight into your baby’s room lamb, pious and involved even.
