In a recent analysis conducted by CleanTechnica, in collaboration with David Cebon, head of the Cambridge Centre for Sustainable Road Freight, a comprehensive list of failed hydrogen bus trials worldwide was compiled. Surprisingly, there were more abandoned trials than active ones, indicating a trend of inefficiency and impracticality with hydrogen buses in the public transportation sector.
While hydrogen buses have faced numerous challenges and setbacks, the focus has now shifted to hydrogen trains. Despite efforts to explore the viability of hydrogen in rail transportation, the results have been far from promising. German states like Baden-Württemberg and Lower Saxony conducted thorough cost assessments, only to conclude that hydrogen trains were significantly more expensive to operate compared to battery-electric or overhead wire powered trains.
The experiences of various rail operators in Germany, such as LNVG, EVB, and RMV, have highlighted the inherent unreliability and high operational costs associated with hydrogen trains. Despite these clear indicators, some regions in France, South Korea, and India have continued to invest in hydrogen-powered trains, overlooking the practicality of battery-electric alternatives.
Furthermore, the Italian government’s decision to allocate €300 million for hydrogen-powered trains raises concerns about the sustainability and long-term feasibility of such investments. With a growing number of failed hydrogen train trials globally, it is evident that this technology poses significant challenges and risks for rail operators and governments alike.
As the cleantech industry continues to evolve, it is crucial for decision-makers to prioritize practicality, cost-effectiveness, and reliability when considering alternative energy solutions for public transportation. Learning from past failures and conducting comprehensive assessments are essential steps in ensuring the success and sustainability of future transportation initiatives.
