Dolores Delgado has returned this week to occupy informative headlines.
The reason is that the Association of Prosecutors (AF) believes that the State Attorney General has not contributed sufficient explanations on the alleged retaliation suffered by the Ignacio Stampa prosecutor, section of the Villarejo case and that remained without a fixed square in the Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office
, on October 27, 2020.
This association has requested a series of documentation about the case that has not been able to obtain when dealing with “reserved matter”.
The AF had required Delgado Information regarding the procedure that is instructed at the National Hearing on the alleged irregular work of the Retired Commissioner Manuel Villarejo.
Specifically, he had asked to know if Exjuez Baltasar Garzón’s office has exercised the defense of any of those investigated in the cause.
They had also requested the “file or disciplinary files initiated against Stampa, in process or already archived”, as well as the abstention file of thin – “of existing” – in relation to the proceedings open to the prosecutor.
In addition, ABC has advanced, Carlos Ruiz de Alegría, the prosecutor who investigated Stampa, declares that he wanted to archive his case (leaving Stampa indeming) but since the Technical Secretariat of the Attorney General, he was suggested that more proceedings be practiced.
He perceives that he wanted to “twist the instruction in order to dilate her”.
In the middle of all this, the fixed seat contest of the Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office of which Stampa was left out.
Precisely Ignacio Stampa has promoted a patrimonial claim because it considers that the process lengthened and therefore could not opt for the square.
He also understands that Delgado should not have participated in the process because the office of Baltasar Garzón’s lawyers is part in the Villarejo case.
The shadow of the former commissioner José Manuel Villarejo plans on that of Dolores Delgado.
Her practices even affected the state’s own prosecutor.
The Portal Moncloa.com published in 2018 audies belonging to a meal that was held in 2009 and attended by Commissioner Villarejo, Dolores Delgado, Baltasar Garzón and other police charges.
The former magistrate expressed this newspaper that was not a sentimental companion of Delgado in February 2009. In the controversial audios, however, the relationship with Dolores Delgado is very good tuning.
“Here is a prosecutor that is only drinking beer, although she then drinks the wine of my drink,” said Garzón as the rest of diners laughed.
This same Summer Delgado and Garzón came together to the Rapa das sites of sabucedo, an international tourist interest in which the Holes fulfill the ancestral rite of cutting the crion to the wild horses.
From his visit to the Province of Pontevedra, he was a direct witness Loc, who was able to see how Garzón and Delgado showed his complicity without tapujos and faders were made regardless of the press that was gathered in the traditional and, to the pandemic, a multitudinous party.
There are many voices that have pointed out the possible conflict of interest that fly over the relationship between Baltasar Garzón and Dolores Delgado.
For the time being, the former magistrate continues its struggle to return to the judiciary and the State Attorney General continues full of the reactivation of the case of Ignacio Stampa.
