Rivera: “we’re on time but we need Sanchez to rectify”
Citizens want to convey the idea that their final offer to the PSOE in order to avoid the repeat election was, as they called, a “State solution”. An approach of minimum and exceptional for a specific time. But not a new strategy for futures agreements . At least for now. The campaign strategy will continue to be the pact with the PP to expel Sánchez from The Moncloa. “I thought I had to do something despite of being consistent with my position”, has justified Albert Rivera.
The president of Citizens, Albert Rivera, has appeared in the Congress of Deputies after the last full session of this new legislature failed. What have you done to sell the reliability of their pacts with the PP, from the experiences of regional and local, as the antithesis of the lack of ability of Pedro Sanchez to reach an agreement. Rivera is committed to reaching an agreement with Married “in less than a month” if the results of the 10 of November give the “one seat over” to the option of removing the PSOE’s Executive: “We have the option of forming an alternative Government to mr. Sanchez”.
The model is the one that has been followed in all the covenants autonomic. is “The Government will be a Government of PP and Cs” , has said Rivera asked expressly by the role of Vox in those agreements. Despite the tensions, in all the places where that sum would work, at the end there was agreement. Rivera stresses that idea in front of a Sanchez, who “has not understood the parliamentary democracy” and that started his campaign by saying that “we were wrong in voting”.
Put the example of these agreements has allowed Rivera to deal with the possibility of an agreement before the elections with the PP in the form of the coalition Spain Adds: “of Course you have to add, as in Andalucia,” he said. But not before. Rivera is convinced that such a formula would push many of its voters not to vote: “we’re Going to add seats to not earn Sanchez . With intelligence. Sanchez you want to a Spain that is both red and blue”, that’s why he defends “a sum intelligent does not subtract votes, please do not send votes to the abstention.”
Also what has been ruled out for the Senate, where the election system penalizes everything that is not the first party and where a covenant prior yes you could have a lot of impact on the final composition of the upper House. This is justified by the “differences” that Citizens and PP have about the role of this institution, as they propose to “reform it or close it”. But, ultimately, the rejection is in the key election so as not to give “instruments” to Sanchez for the new campaign in terms of polarization as the 28 of April: “it Is important not to give even a single excuse.”
