The Court of Auditors has filed the research initiated last June as a result of a complaint of citizens by the rescue of the airline Plus Ultra for 53 million euros by the Fund of the State Society of Industrial Participations (SEPI), Han
Informed Europe Press sources of compliant training.

Thus discard the thesis of the orange formation on an alleged impairment of public funds, which establish that the 34 million euros facilitated to the airline are a loan.
The paralysis of the remaining 19 million euros by order of a judge could lead to the company’s inviability, both the airline and the state advocacy have been warned.
On the part of citizens, an appeal against this decision is planned, add the same sources.

The complaint was presented by the President of CS, Francadas, his deputy spokesman at the Edmundo Bal congress and his eurodiputate Luis Garicano on June 7.

Citizens had claimed the Supervisory Branch to investigate the responsibility of all the authorities for this operation to resist if there are accounting infractions, debugging how much money has been diverted and ensure the return of money to public coffers.

The admission of the complaint of citizens supposed the opening of a piece of public action and the appointment of an instructor of the prosecution section of this body, which has finally not found indications and has filed the actions.

The matter is also in the hands of the ordinary courts.
Last week, the holder of the 15th Instruction Court of Madrid, Esperanza Collazos, ordered to suspend the delivery to plus ultra * of the 34 million euros that are part of the rescue to the airline and that should be disbursed on July 28
, so that the company accredits that you really need this loan to pay creditors.

According to the judge, “the disbursement of the amount of 34,000,000 euros, as a participatory loan scheduled for July 28, within a feasibility plan for the Plus Ultra company, it must be justified, given the existence of
This “judicial.

In addition to appealing this file, citizens could be reserved to reappear action against this aid in the Court of Auditors in the event that the Company does not return loans received after the decision of the Judge to paralyze them.