The Court of Auditors only brings together the bonds of four of the 34 accused of embezzlement with the Foreign Network of the Generalitat of Catalonia, according to sources by the Supply Agency.
Most have welcomed the endorsement announced by the Catalan government and its defenses assure that they have achieved two more days of term.
Sources of the Supervisory Agency confirm that they have been granted 48 more “unreliers” with the argument that the instructor delegate, hope García has not yet received endorsement of the Generalitat, but a mere “announcement”.
At the moment, the bonds presented and certified by the Court of Auditors, “two responsible suspects have deposited the bonds and two others have presented real estate such as ADVAL,” indicate in the organism without specifying names.
In the cause, the main leaders of Proctors include former Catalan Presidents Artur More and Carles Puigdemont and the former Vice President of Generalitat Oriol Junquerras.
As posted by the world in its edition of this Thursday, the Court of Auditors has put in question and ignore the Aval of the Generalitat at the time of accepting the bonds to gather the 5.4 million euros claimed for
The set of 34 defendants, most leading political politicians.
By treating the Generalitat of Catalonia of the entity allegedly harmed by the embezzlement, the Court of Auditors is reluctant to accept a guarantee of public funds from the Catalan institut of Finances (ICF), which is “owned by the Generalitat de Catalonia”, according to
Define himself.
The former president of the Generalitat Artur more has declared this Thursday on the chain to be that there are “very important probabilities” that the Court of Accounts rejects it.
At the moment, the instructor delegate is only certifying the aforementioned bonds with tangible goods, according to the sources consulted.
The Court of Auditors also prepares provision of embargo, not to see for now that there is a bail of 5.4 million, although in the agency, indicate, when such providence is dictated are not irrevocable.
If after studying guarantees or other types of bonds that now question, it ends up accepting them, it can stop the execution of the embargo.
At the moment, what he does is sort the preventive embargo in the sense of noting in the property record that such a housing is deposited as a guarantee, but the accused of embezzlement can continue living in it until there is a firm sentence if it concluded with a sentence.
In cases where the defendants do not present acceptable bonds, the instructor delegate can order the embargo in the sense of taking it as a guarantee even if the affected is denied.
