The national audience has confirmed the processing of the employer Javier López Madrid for harassment to Dr. María Elisa Pinto with which the former Councilor of OHL maintained a private conflict, which abcomers the procedure in oral trial.
The criminal room has issued a car, which has had EFE access, which rejects the appeal of López Madrid against the Auto of the head of the Central Court number 6 of the audience, Manuel García Castellón, who agreed his processing
For active bribery, as well as former commissar José Manuel Villarejo and his round Rafael partner, although in his case for passive bribery.
The defense of the Dermatologist Elisa Pinto asks six years of prison for López Madrid for supposedly hiring Villarejo, for whom he also requests another six years in prison, when he was still active in the police to harass the doctor.
This piece of the Villarejo case is instructed on the margin of the procedure that has investigated the Capital’s number 39 Instruction Court, where López Madrid and José Villarejo are prosecuted by the alleged crimes of harassment, threats and injuries towards Pinto, which asks for them 22
Years of prison.
In addition, there is a third procedure in the Court of Instruction number 26 of the capital in which López Madrid asks to process Pinto for harassment and she requests the file.
In its appeal, the lawyer’s lawyer asked the room “the dismissal and archive of the performances with respect to Javier López Madrid, because there is no deserving behavior of criminal reproach as far as it is neither signs of crime” since “no
He made offer or delivery of Dádiva, promise or remuneration in favor of Villarejo, which is why there is no evidence. ”
And, as a subsidiary, he requested to revoke the processing car and continue the instruction by gathering full testimony of the diligence of the number 26 court of Madrid.
But the room highlights that there are “indications of the possible commission of a crime”, so that the decision of the magistrate to prosecute those investigated “is accurate and correct.”
“What can not successfully pretend an investigated party is to impose the dismissal or continuation of the instructional phase, by practicing new diligences of research, the instructor, against the criterion of it,” he adds.
In addition, the Chamber endorses the criterion of García Castellón de “which in this Court is not investigated, the alleged harassment experienced María Elisa Pinto, but that the facts subject to instruction are tied to the existence of a crime of bribery (…)
Existence of signs of the contracting of the services of a commissioner of the National Police of Police in active at the time of production of the facts. ”
