It has been one of the themes of the day at the Congress of the Deputies.
What is the final United Posture can with regard to labor reform after Yolanda Díaz recognized that “technically” can not be repealed?
The Second Vice President has given a new step this Thursday and has defined the action that plans to execute the Government as a “enormous transformation” of the labor market in which it is going to “derogate” partly the labor model of the PP.
This remodeling, as the Executive raises, “implies repealing parties from the labor reform of the PP and transforming others,” said Diaz in the hallways of the lower house, in statements collected by Europe Press.
At the last minute of this Wednesday, in an interview on the sixth, he admitted that the term “derogate” was a “political fetish” that could not be applied to the disassembly of the work scaffolding of the popular party, given its enormous complexity.
The 2012 ‘Labor Reform “was expanded and affected more than 20 precepts of the Status of Workers, several real decrees and several directives,” said Díaz, which is why the idea managed by the government, in line with component 23 of the
Recovery plan sent to Brussels, it is “delete some aspects” of the norm developed in times of Mariano Rajoy.
“But others did not,” he specified.
Others, such as the days of compensation for dismissal that agreed the PP.
“The dismissals are not going to be played,” Rotunda Díaz, who defended that this particular point is not part of the Government Agreement between the PSOE and the United Can we, so that this proposal is not expected to come out of the Ministry of Labor.
A news that has generated discomfort in the unions, which have claimed on Thursday to the Minister “Restrict” the dismissal.
The controversy around how to define the purpose of the government is, according to Minister Alberto Garzón, a mere “semantic” question.
The owner of consumption has opined, as Díaz, that the term “derogate” has an important “political sense” and has asked not to focus attention on the form, but in the content.
“Technically it is to change articles of regulations,” has considered Garzón after being questioned by this matter, from which he does not see greater controversy since “both dimensions”, to speak of repealing and that of specifying that will only affect certain points, ”
they are compatible”.
At the extraordinary meeting held on Tuesday between the PSOE and the United States, we are endorsed to baptize as “repeal” the Government’s commitment regarding labor reform.
However, since then socialists, in line with their position in recent days, have avoided the use of this term.
This Wednesday, on the one hand, the First Vice President and Minister of Economic Affairs, Nadia Calviño, talked about “correct aspects”, and that of Finance, María Jesús Montero, of “correcting errors”.
Finally, Díaz, who gave the “Zanjada” the domestic discussion, used the expression “delete some aspects” instead of “repealing”, which until now was the great purple vindication on labor reform, manifested in the coalition agreement itself
.
Although in we can reduce “semantic” issues the mess, not only social agents criticize that there are points that are not foreseen to reform.
Also its parliamentary partners have warned the danger of the coalition if it does not comply with His Word.
This has been highlighted by Eh Bildu’s economic spokesperson at Congress, Oskar Matute.
During the last session of the debate about the amendments of all the General Budgets of the State, Matute has warned the banking of both parties that the continuity of the Government and its credibility inevitably pass by ending the labor model of the PP: “Yes No
Derogate the labor reform, if they do not comply with their word and the agreements signed by you, it is very likely that you lose the elections. And you will be the only ones responsible for you to go right for not fulfilling the promises. ”
