The presiding judge speaks of a “psychological piece” that was not for him to understand. Thomas Sagebiel, who directs the process to the murder of Walter Lübcke, want to understand the behavior of the defendant. According to the different statements made by Stephan E. about yourself, that will not easily fall. Especially since so far, there is hardly a day without new inconsistencies passed. Last Wednesday had stood e., the Kassel government President shot. The co-defendants, Markus H. he charged a lot since then; therefore, this could, indeed, have been complicit in it. It was the third Version of the Tatgeschehens, the presented E. to make a “clean sweep”. Two days later, the next “clarification”, as the defendant says followed.
Marlene Grunert
editor in the policy.
F. A. Z.
On Monday, the questions, the doubts as to E.’s credibility prompt again. In the first confession he had given to have been in front of the Day several times on the grounds of the family Lübcke stood, armed and for the fact ready. He denies now. “Then you have acted the good,” says the judge Christoph Koller; the former had been “impressive”. E. was involved in the recorded interrogation in detail. “Trembling,” he confessed to the plot. He didn’t make it, had e. said at the time. I thought he: “In the Fair, as you shoot him.” All he invented free, also want to know the chief Prosecutor Dieter Killmer. The defendant nods.
at Least the motives for the various statements one had to know, to know what he would have you believe, says Killmer. He was the official “lie”, to “make the thing more credible,” says E. he Also didn’t want to the “psycho-Nazi”; and “the thing should look like”. “A piece of egotism,” says the judge, is trying to bring this trait with the Remorse expressed by the accused in the same hearing in accordance. But this “psychological piece” does not seem plausible.
As it is given to him after the fact?
Dieter Killmer power of e. again and again his contradictory behaviour. He focuses on the role of the main accused, Markus H. attributes. The narrow-lipped E. there, the more the Prosecutor is. Killmer want to know exactly when you’ve made the common deeds tschluss how the conversation had expired. “Explain this!” the e. responding behavior. At the request of the Chairman, judge E., told how it had fared with him after the fact: “very bad”. Sagebiel wants to know: “Out of remorse or fear of discovery?” “Everything.” With H. he had never spoken again about the fact –although we have seen only a few days later, in the shooting club. The Prosecutor stuck to: “you have killed a man, you are depressed. The only Person you could talk to, don’t you?“ E. responds: “He should have come to me.”
The judge to another statement, the level of detail for e. a disadvantage could be. In the first interview he had given, on the 6. To January 2016 so much about the Cologne, new year’s eve night, excited that he ran through the streets, and election posters of the Green had been assigned to. A foreigner he had to call out: “you should cut the neck.” Why he had still been the days after new year’s so upset, wants to know sagebiel. Now E. on have not at all know whether it’s the 6. January had been. The date came to him in the interrogation “spontaneously”. On this day, was stabbed in Lohfelden a young Iraqi, and E. it is also this fact to the load. He denies having to do with the attack a bit.
