lawyers have criticised the reaction of left politicians to the judgment of the Thuringian constitutional court of the so-called parity law. An allegation had been that the judgment had come, mainly, because the majority of the judges of the constitutional court as a male. The President of the bar Association of Thuringia, Jan Helge Kestel, said the F. A. S.: “attacks that draw the court’s legitimacy in doubt, do not accept.” When the gender of a judge as “the sole basis of his decision, then that is the delegitimization of the courts on the crown”. Kestel stressed that constitutional court judges were already a political balance, rather than following to the office. This is already a guarantee for a balanced decision.

Morten Freidel

an editor in the politics of the Frankfurt General Sunday newspaper

F. A. Z. Twitter

“How the citizens should accept the decisions of the policy, if the politicians demonstrate to him that you are only to accept the verdicts of courts willing to fit you in the stuff?”

Brigitte Kreuder-Sonnen of the New Association of judges, said of the F. A. S.: “men can only decide in the sense of men, women are only in the sense of women – the simple write-UPS that do not conform to the judicial decision-making in this one-Dimensionality.” More women on the court have not necessarily led to a different verdict. However, Kreuder-Sonnen, and to increase the number of women on constitutional courts.