at this time of the year skatteförhandlingar between the government and the social samarbetspartierna the Liberal party and the Centre party. Political parties are notorious for wanting to cut taxes for those who already have the most, in the wallet. This does not bode well. The tax system is crucial in order to be able to put an end to economic inequality.

for the social democrats, said the welfare system only, but, so far, we have seen how the priority of tax cuts for the rich.
No shame in a RUT ” of proposals
The only thing that is circled in the layout of the budget table, for the next year will be a further tax cut. This has the potential to be more of a contribution to society. There is talk of increased MESH-related services. The proposal as a tax deduction for the blomvattning has been heard in the debate. Also, the tax rebates for transport to the dry cleaner, and less, in order to rearrange the furniture in the home. This is at the same time as income disparities are increasing in Sweden. It doesn’t make any sense.

the Fact is that Sweden is a country in the EUROPEAN union’s 15 core, which has the least redistributive tax systems. Sweden has one of the few countries in the OECD that are neither net wealth tax, inheritance tax, capital gains tax or a land tax, which is linked to the value of the property. High incomes, great fortunes, and a great deal of capital is often inherited. Usually people get gneta.
the Five steps to well-being,

Sweden is in need of a fiscal policy on the reduction of health inequalities. Here are five concrete proposals for closing the gaps in the welfare system immediately.

with the Money we are putting on the RUT should be in place to enhance the cleaning in the Anna, 86, who now gets cleaned every three weeks only, and the rate she will pay is increased. The money can also go to to clean up schools and hospitals. Where are they going, to the common good.

It is not fair to the home owner in northern sweden has received a large increase, while the home owner in Danderyd, sweden, has received tens of thousands of dollars of reduction. It does not make sense, but the real estate tax should be progressive, and so it is with a luxury villa in Danderyd, sweden may be paying a higher tax than is the case for the träkåken in Kiruna, sweden.

the Phenomenon has been made that income inequality has increased sharply. They are really skewed distributed. In one year, in the tenth with the highest incomes, as much of the capital income share, at which all the children will get in child support each month, in the last ten years.

Negotiating with us, and it is a policy that is good for the majority, not the few at the top.

the bank was already made in the last legislature but had to be processed in the EUROPEAN union. Let us see, the Centre party and the Liberal party to introduce it. The banks and the taxpayer guarantees for their losses. It is, of course, that they are going to pay more in taxes.

over the years We have seen the rate of tax for owners of closely held companies were simplified and reduced in number of steps. As a result, for example, venture capitalists will pay 20 per cent tax, while a worker will pay significantly more in tax on their work. Wages and salaries have been transformed into low-taxed capital income. Therefore, the so-called 3:12 rules are changed, then the owners ‘ wages and salaries to a much greater extent subject to the just the wages, and not be converted into income property. The expense of the percentage with the highest incomes, but to raise money for people’s welfare.

Negotiating with us,
the Government is collaborating with two political parties competing to cut taxes the most. At the same time, there is a välfärdskris out there in the community. It makes no sense.

in Sweden, the need of the left party’s proposal on a fiscal policy for economic equality. A policy that guarantees the welfare system with the resources it needs. That would increase economic equality and reduce the disparities between urban and rural areas. To negotiate with the us, and it is a policy that is good for the majority, not the few at the top.

Our proposal should be regarded as advice on the way forward for future negotiations. We can help provide on site.

the Economic-policy spokesman.

the tax policy spokesman.

READ MORE: , which is Why this bet is for the rich men, Annie Lööf?

READ MORE: Scrap miljardslöseriet with the orange of the envelope – put the money in the fattigpensionärer READ MORE: , Raise taxes, and end up with a tönteriernaVänsterpartiet to win over THE voters of SD