The Scientific Basis for Lifting Bans on Quantum Computer Exports
Several countries have imposed restrictions on the export of quantum computers, despite the current devices having limited practical applications. These restrictions, which are based on the number of qubits and error rates, seem arbitrary and go against the scientific evidence.
The specificity of the restrictions indicates concerns about the potential misuse of quantum computers, particularly in breaking encryption methods, for national security reasons. However, without transparency and access to the research behind these limitations, it is challenging to assess the validity of such concerns.
In the scientific community, open collaboration and peer review are essential for scrutinizing and improving research. Drawing parallels with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which synthesizes climate research for policymakers, demonstrates the power of transparent and evidence-based decision-making.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, published research facilitated public discussions on policy decisions. In contrast, imposing restrictions on quantum computers without a solid scientific basis undermines effective governance and innovation.
It is crucial for policymakers to engage with the scientific community and consider the implications of their decisions on technological advancements. By fostering transparency and collaboration, governments can ensure that regulations on emerging technologies are grounded in scientific evidence and promote global progress.
