President Biden has been expressing his frustration with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel for not heeding his calls for restraint in Gaza. In March, when asked if Israel invading the southern Gaza city of Rafah would be a “red line,” Biden responded that it was, but made it clear that he would never abandon Israel.
It was unclear what consequences would follow, but it seemed like Biden was considering a suspension of offensive weapon transfers while continuing to provide defensive weapons. In April, Biden once again urged Netanyahu to agree to an immediate cease-fire and take specific actions to address civilian harm and humanitarian suffering in Gaza.
The White House emphasized that U.S. policy towards Gaza would be determined by Israel’s response to these calls for action. In May, Biden reiterated his stance, stating that if Israel were to invade Rafah, he would halt the supply of weapons used in attacks against cities.
Netanyahu’s repeated dismissal of Biden’s calls for restraint shows a clear underestimation of the President’s authority and willingness to take a stand. This dynamic between the two leaders highlights the complexities of U.S.-Israel relations and the challenges of balancing support for Israel with advocating for human rights and peace in the region.
It is crucial for both leaders to find common ground and work towards a peaceful resolution in Gaza that prioritizes the well-being of civilians and addresses the root causes of the conflict. As the situation continues to unfold, it remains to be seen how Biden will navigate the delicate balance between supporting Israel and holding them accountable for their actions.