José Luis Moreno has left the judicial future of the ‘Titella case’ in the hands of the Criminal Room of the National Hearing after the magistrate who instructs him rejected annuling the proceedings, just as his defense intended.
The television producer understands that ‘Titella’ is to be filed because it comes from a vitiated procedure because it was continued to be investigated after the first period of instruction expires.
The ‘Showman’ remains accused of allegedly leading a plot to defraud banks that, according to the proceedings, was made with 85 million euros illicitly with 700 phantom companies.
Moreno is installed in this battle since last September, when he raised it for the first time.
The head of the central court of instruction number 2 of the national audience, Ismael Moreno, does not share his criteria.
The pretension of the defense, he ran at the reply of him to reject the thesis of the producer, “nor is it provided neither coherent.”
After the decision of the instructor, the ventriloco has presented an appeal before the criminal room so that it is the one who decides whether its aspirations to override all the cause have or not traveled.
The process referred to in the defense of Moreno is that of the denunciation presented by those responsible for Avanca before the 13th Instructional Court in which they alerted that they had been victims of the deception of a criminal organization that had managed to subtract them 1.396
.000 euros.
It was, allegedly, the network of the television producer.
The cause was opened by scam and documentary falsehood.
This denunciation caused the Civil Guard and the National Police to intervene, whose agents practiced new diligences in which they proved that, in addition to Abanca, the plot had also appropriated funds from other banking entities such as Liberbank, ING, Bankinter and Bankia.
After accrediting the researchers, the relevance of the investigations, they baptized the case as ‘TITELLA’ and disconnected it from that initial complaint.
In viewing that the network had ramifications abroad, the matter ended in the central court of instruction number 2 of the national audience.
With the first compasses of ‘Titella’, Abanca’s instruction was paralyzed.
The first semester was sterile and, when it was consumed, according to the lawyer in its appeal, the judge did not declare the complexity of the cause and, without doing so, agreed again for the 18-month instruction.
Then, in April 2019, the magistrate asked to inhibit the central court who investigates ‘Titella’.
The lawyer of José Luis Moreno argues in his resource that the proceeding of the instructional magistrate 14 was not correct.
Regarding the arguments of the lawyer to dynamite the procedure, the ‘Titella’ instructor magistrate is pointed out: “Not even considering that the right to effective judicial guardianship can be violated, the tests initially obtained be an instrument with the contributing
In the different police trades ».
Finally, the instructor is pointed out in his car: “Since the first are exclusively referred to the fraud-defraudatory fact of the cause and the following relate to the material, which non-legal, with which they allow the
Existence of a criminal organization dedicated constantly to the banking scam commission “.
