First he said yes, after not and finally the former president of the Generalitat has reapped to the European Justice in clear reaction to the judicial offensive undertaken by the Instructor of Proctors, Magistrate Pablo Llarena.
Carles Puigdemont has presented an appeal on Friday before the General Court of the European Union (TGue) asking the immunity as a MEP, after its detention and subsequent liberation in Italy last week, as reported by the court in a statement and
He has confirmed his lawyer, Gonzalo Boye.
The TGue withdrew the immunity on July 30 to the three MEPs of JXCAT -Puigdemont, Toni Comín and Clara PonSatí- because he understood that the Euro-orders against them were suspended, according to what the State Law said, but opened the door to
That they presented a new resource if they were arrested, as happened when former Catalan president landed on Thursday, September 23 at Alguer Airport, on the Italian island of Sardinia.
Sources of depreciation defense consulted by the world disconnected this request for precautionary measures to an attempt to stop in extremis any possibility of delivery of the Italian authorities to the Spanish Supreme Court.
They insist that if it were a maneuver to condition the position of the Italian judge, precautionary measures would have been requested and not precautionary ones that will take weeks to be resolved.
They add that the objective is to stop future detentions in other European countries.
However, the Puigdemont legal team maintains that they have a total confidence that the Sassari Court of Appeal will leave it at liberty next Monday.
Parallel to the presentation of this resource, Puigdemont will travel to Sardinia (Italy) will declare this Monday before the one that left him free without precautionary measures and that he should now decide on his possible extradition to Spain.
After the arrest of Puigdemont, Magistrate Llarena, which instructs the cause against the Catalan Former President, sent the Italian judicial authorities the Euroorden that issued against him on October 14, 2019.
Llarena then asked, and reiterated yesterday, Thursday, the delivery of Puigdemont, claiming that the Euroorden is active, unlike what defended state advocacy before the TGue.
The version of the state advocacy is that the Euroorden is suspended, waiting for the Court of Justice of the EU to resolve the preliminary question posed by the reasons why an extradition may be rejected, after which the
Court of appeal of Brussels denied the delivery of the former Consellerlluis Puig.
In addition, the Prochessian instructor asked the Sassari Court yesterday, in the event that Carles Puigdemont returned to the precautionary recovery of his immunity as eurobiliamentary and “supposed to be granted”,
Italy then suspend the processing of the delivery process now initiated, but adopting the precise measures to ensure that the necessary material conditions are continued for effective delivery when Puigdemont has stopped enjoying the privilege or immunity.
Otherwise, that is, in the event that the removal of the immunity is currently prevailing is maintained, and only for the fact that the Italian court understood that the response to the preliminary ruling can condition its decision, LLarena pointed out the possibility of
That the Italian judicial authority parapets the execution procedure until it resolves in the Tjue.
