KulturÅSIKTSka of them do not have permission to publish the poems?It’s time for a change in klassikerlagen – or get rid of the avPetter Larsson ”
This is a kulturartikel , which is a part of Some opinionsjournalistik.Several Works Made In, and Peter was HeidenstamKULTUR but propagandasajt in the course of a couple of of the articles on the poets
Viktor Rydberg , Made In: , Verner von Heidenstam
as quoted from their own poetry.
< a href=”_2ZkCB”> Now, to the Swedish Academy to take action against this irreverent use of the English cultural heritage. In the first place, it is intended to invite the nazis to take away the diktstroferna, under the threat of a court case, ” reports the new york times.
< a href=”_3mRIX” data-test-id=”text” data-component-key=”list”> I don’t envy the judge trying to determine exactly what it is, “the spirit of the interests of the would mean.
< a href=”_2ZkCB”>
The result of that invoked to an extreme unknown to the law no under the copyright of which is called a klassikerskyddet. It has, in and of itself is understandable, the purpose is to protect the important works in which the author has long been dead, to really, really offensive to use.
< a href=”_2ZkCB> It was added in the 1960s, but it has not yet been applied in a court of law.
< a href=”_2ZkCB, and It is not a coincidence.
< a href=”_2ZkCB”> & nbsp;
read: , “If a literary or artistic work återgives the public in a way that offends the spiritual, cultural interests, will take the court at the instance of the authority appointed by the government under penalty of a fine, notify the prohibition of the representation.”
< a href=”_2ZkCB”> The “violator” in this context is to be interpreted as a very serious infringement is one thing, but I don’t envy the judge trying to determine exactly what it is, “the spirit of the interests of the would mean.
< a href=”_2ZkCB”> & nbsp;
50’s preparatory work of the act does not provide so much guidance. As an example of what could be the prohibition of the use, it is mentioned that “the classical musical compositions have been the subject of jazzparafraser, and other corruptions,” and it also refers to the work of the During , the sharp cut in the range of, and associated with the ekivoka chapter titles, and in addition included advertising for birth control!
< a href=”_2ZkCB”> “the public should be able to intervene in the processes of this kind it is obvious’ that when the.
< a href=”_2ZkCB”> & nbsp;
by 2019, we would. well, småle about it, just as certainly, a fair proportion of the population made already, and the question is, of course, is what a court would deem as “offensive” now? Exclusive: kullorna as a teen? Someone is drunk and He -verse as an advertisement for the nätdroger? Optional, Carl Larsson , the children as a stay-at-home?
< a href=”_3mRIX” data-test-id=”text” data-component-key=”list”> right next to the gloriösa statements about their own acts of violence, fantasies of the aryan race’s struggle for independence, and the Hitler video is some of the supremely romantic, and sometimes rasbiologiskt anstrukna verses of the three poets.
< a href=”_2ZkCB”> & nbsp;
In the present in case there is not even any distortion of the work, but in his life, simply, has been published in an extremely offensive context. Right next to the gloriösa statements about their own acts of violence, fantasies of the aryan race’s struggle for independence, and Hitler : that video is some seriously romantic and, sometimes, rasbiologiskt anstrukna verses of the three poets.
< a href=”_2ZkCB”> You can, of course, to be a holy damn about how their work in this way, the instruments of the nazi party. However, this policy kulturvandalism should be illegal, I find it hard to see, and I can’t imagine that it’s been envisaged by the people behind the site, who most likely have never heard of klassikerskyddet.
< a href=”_2ZkCB”> & nbsp;
guess it’s really not the Academy either. In 2005, declared that the paragraph was “probably it would be very difficult to enforce, inter alia, on the basis of the high standard of proof that would be.”
< a href=”_2ZkCB”> so I would hazard a guess that the nazis were not going to be obedient to Its precepts. & nbsp;
Why on earth would they bother, when they can be absolutely sure that it was never going to end up in a court of law, and when they are, if that would happen, just as surely will be the pioneers?
< a href=”_2ZkCB”> Conversely, they are probably glad of the attention.
< a href=”_2ZkCB”> & nbsp;
The conclusion I’m the drag is that you now get to rewrite the law so that it can be used. However, it would be likely to be a fairly drastic limitation of the freedom of expression.
< a href=”_2ZkCB”> Or maybe it actually is time to abolish the one law that has had 59 years to leave the paper and take a step out into the real world.
this ARTICLE DEALS with OMEsaias In+ FÖLJVerner von Heidenstam+ FÖLJViktor He+ FÖLJLÄS OCKSÅ23 October, CULTURE of, ‘We swedes are so naive and blue-eyed”, October 25, CULTURE and Feminism is to not have to accept the fact that women are viewed as men to agree”on 24 October, the CULTURE.”Hello?” ” is expected, but there is nothing in the spåren25 October KULTURJag to view the women’s 40-talister, as some of the men to view the krigshistoria18 October KULTURI to Express the burden of proof is on the accused, and
