“no one today can afford to have no awareness of the processes and effects of canonicalization of the own scientific discipline and the Canonical with the Model not to be confused,” wrote recently, the literary scholar Andrea Geier in the Online magazine “history of the present”. Canon questions are questions of Power. So it’s no wonder that the debate about what belongs in the Canon, and who decides, is flaring up again and again – for the literature and your science Hanna angel Meier has delivered on this in the “mercury” is just a concise situation report underlines the importance of the Canon debates for the self-understanding of the “operation”.
the law thinks in the light of any phenomena of pluralisation and fragmentation more often about yourself, your “Proprium”and “formats”, to quote the title of relevant collective volumes (Tübingen, 2008, Weilerswist 2017). And, more recently, on their Canon. Since Canon makes the questions to ask are, is it not the Execution of a counter-proposal lists a Canon of criticism, as it is in other Humanities common. In a sub-chronic diversity deficits, tired of the tray, will remain for the foreseeable future, more of the “old white men” and their texts, not embossed, not on the Hand, who would be nominate for an alternative Canon.
